It's Beyond Our Control: Analysis of Business Press Coverage of Industry Price Hikes

★

☆

SHARE

Overview

Paper Summary

Conflicts of Interest

Identified Weaknesses

Rating Explanation

Good to know

Topic Hierarchy

File Information

Paper Summary

Paperzilla title

Are Price Hikes Really "Beyond Our Control"? A Look at How Business Reporters Explain Inflation

This study suggests that business news coverage tends to attribute price increases to external factors rather than companies' decisions. The study manually analyzed a subset of 100 articles from a larger dataset, finding that reporters were more likely to cite factors outside of companies’ control. However, limitations exist due to manual coding and subjective interpretation of "fairness."

Possible Conflicts of Interest

One of the authors is cited in one of the articles analyzed, which represents a minor conflict of interest. Additionally, the limited explanations for manual exclusions raise concerns about potential selection bias.

Identified Weaknesses

Subjectivity in Causal Categorization

The authors manually categorize articles by causal factors, introducing potential for subjective bias. There is no objective measure or inter-rater reliability assessment.

Lack of Ground Truth Comparison

There is a lack of comparison to actual causes of price increases. The authors only look at reporting, so there is no standard to verify against.

Manual Exclusion

The manual exclusion criteria seem arbitrary. For example, excluding articles about purely future price hikes because discussions of cause "may include less detailed or informed discussions of cause" is speculative and unjustified.

Small sample size

The sample size of 100 articles is relatively small compared to all potential articles. This small sample size reduces the robustness of the analysis.

Recency bias

The dataset creation process has a bias. Newer articles are overrepresented.

Subjective Unfairness Indicator

The authors acknowledge their limitations in determining 'unfairness' but don't propose solutions to mitigate this subjectivity.

Rating Explanation

This descriptive study analyzes an interesting topic with a reasonable approach but suffers from some methodological limitations. The manual classification of articles, the relatively small sample size, and the lack of ground truth comparison limit the generalizability of the findings. The minor COI slightly reduces the rating.

Good to know

This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.

Explore Pro →