Projectification mediates between experimental and bureaucratic institutional logics in urban sustainability planning
Overview
Paper Summary
This study of Swedish urban sustainability planners found they value both traditional and innovative approaches, but project management practices tend to reinforce traditional, bureaucratic approaches. While planners express a desire for flexibility and open-ended exploration, in practice, they prioritize clear objectives and roles, potentially limiting more radical sustainability ambitions.
Explain Like I'm Five
Swedish city planners like both traditional and innovative approaches to urban sustainability, but in practice, project-based work often favors traditional methods.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
The authors received funding from Viable cities and VINNOVA, but there's no information suggesting these organizations have direct, vested interests in specific outcomes that would bias the research.
Identified Limitations
Rating Explanation
This is a reasonable study with a mixed-methods approach. However, the limited sample size, reliance on self-reported perceptions, and lack of direct behavioral observation prevent a higher rating. The funding sources do not appear to present a significant conflict of interest.
Good to know
This is the Starter analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →