After fragmentation: Norm collisions, interface conflicts, and conflict management
Overview
Paper Summary
The study finds that norm collisions and institutional overlaps in international law do not inevitably lead to fragmentation or chaos. Instead, they frequently lead to cooperative forms of conflict management that generate inter-institutional order, though the normative quality of this order remains contested. The authors propose an 'interface conflict' framework for analyzing these dynamics.
Explain Like I'm Five
Scientists found that when different rules from different groups or countries bump into each other, things don't always get messy. Instead, they often work together to make a new system, even if people still argue if the new system is fair.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
None identified
Identified Limitations
Rating Explanation
This paper introduces a valuable framework for studying norm collisions in international law. The interface conflict framework and its micro-level approach provides a nuanced understanding of how overlaps and collisions are activated and managed. The analysis of conflict management types is particularly insightful, showing how collisions can be creative of order. While there are limitations, the theoretical contribution and empirical findings are significant enough to warrant a strong rating.
Good to know
This is the Starter analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →