Causality vs. Correlation
The study uses an instrumental variable approach (cloud cover affecting satellite monitoring and thus, enforcement) to suggest a causal link between enforcement and reduced violence. However, observational studies like this, even with clever instruments, can't definitively prove causality. Other unmeasured factors correlated with both cloud cover and violence could be at play.
Limited Scope of Enforcement Measure
The study focuses on deforestation-related fines as a proxy for enforcement intensity. This might not capture the full picture of enforcement activities or their impact. Other forms of environmental crime or enforcement strategies are not considered.
Potential for Omitted Variable Bias
Despite including various controls, there's always a risk of omitted variable bias in observational studies. Unmeasured factors correlated with both deforestation and violence could confound the estimated relationship. For example, the presence of organized crime could both drive deforestation and increase violence, independent of enforcement efforts.
The study uses homicides as the primary measure of violence, potentially overlooking other forms of violence or conflict that might be affected by environmental enforcement. A more comprehensive approach would consider a wider range of violent and non-violent crimes.
The study discusses several potential mechanisms linking enforcement to violence reduction but cannot definitively isolate their individual contributions or rule out alternative explanations. Further research is needed to precisely identify the causal pathways.