Heavy reliance on mouse models
The study relies heavily on mouse models, and while there are translational findings in human post-mortem tissue, the direct relevance to living human MDD needs further investigation, particularly regarding the dynamic changes in BBB permeability in response to stress and treatment.
Stress resilience as a fluid concept
Stress resilience is a complex and not fully understood phenotype, which can impact the interpretation of the findings and the differentiation between susceptible and resilient mice.
Limited brain region analysis
Focusing only on the NAc and PFC might not capture the full picture of BBB alterations in other emotion-regulation brain regions.
Lack of mechanistic detail
While the study explores some potential pathways (omega-3/omega-6, GDNF-Ret, TGFβ, Wnt), detailed mechanistic links between these pathways and Cldn5 regulation and BBB dysfunction require further investigation.
Missing positive control for BBB disruption
The study lacks a positive control group for BBB disruption, which would strengthen the causal link between Cldn5 downregulation and behavioral changes.
Confounding variable in SI test
It is not clear why the authors used a male social target for the SI test after CSDS, especially given their focus on female stress responses and the potential confounding effects of intersex social interaction.
Limited protein and functional validation
The study primarily examines transcriptional changes; further validation at the protein level and functional assays (e.g., permeability assays) would provide more comprehensive insights into BBB dysfunction.
Further investigation is needed to establish the specific role of estrogen and estrogen receptors in mediating the observed sex differences in BBB alterations.
Small sample size for some experiments
The small sample size for some of the experiments (e.g., human post-mortem tissue, multiplex assays) could limit the statistical power and generalizability of the findings.