PAPERZILLA
Crunching Academic Papers into Bite-sized Insights.
About
Sign Out
← Back to papers

Social SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and FinanceEconomics and Econometrics

A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker)
SHARE
Overview
Paper Summary
Conflicts of Interest
Identified Weaknesses
Rating Explanation
Good to know
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Paper Summary
Paperzilla title
World Lockdown Scorecard: We Tracked 19 Policies in 180+ Countries!
This paper introduces the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT), a database tracking 19 pandemic policies across 180+ countries. The data reveal a global convergence in policy adoption during the initial phase of the pandemic, followed by divergence as countries eased and reimposed restrictions. The study demonstrates the database's potential by analyzing its correlation with mobility data.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
The authors received funding from the Blavatnik Family Foundation, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, and the UK Cabinet Office. While these organizations may have interests related to pandemic response and policy, the authors state the funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, or publication decisions.
Identified Weaknesses
Oversimplification and potential bias from composite indices
The study acknowledges the limitations of using composite indices, as they oversimplify the complex and nuanced reality of government responses. The indices weight each indicator and interval equally, which may not be appropriate for all research questions and could introduce measurement bias if certain indicators are systematically correlated with outcomes of interest.
Subjectivity and resource intensity of human coding
The study relies on human coding, which, while aiming for accuracy and consistency, can still be subjective and resource-intensive. Automated methods have not yet proven as effective, but future research could explore combining technological approaches with human coding.
Lack of data on policy implementation and compliance
The dataset captures the number and degree of policies but doesn't measure implementation, enforcement, or compliance. This crucial information is missing, making it harder to draw conclusions about the real-world impact of policies.
Loss of granularity in large jurisdictions
The coding scheme loses granularity in large, diverse jurisdictions, potentially misrepresenting the overall policy landscape. While subnational data is available for some countries, this issue remains a challenge for cross-national comparisons.
Rating Explanation
This database is a valuable resource for researchers studying the impact of government policies on the pandemic, offering comprehensive and comparable data. The limitations around composite indices, coding methods, and lack of implementation data are acknowledged and don't detract significantly from the overall utility. The potential for conflicts of interest is noted but appears to be mitigated by the authors' transparent disclosure and stated independence from funders.
Good to know
This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →
File Information
Original Title:
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker)
File Name:
s41562-021-01079-8.pdf
[download]
File Size:
4.04 MB
Uploaded:
July 14, 2025 at 05:18 PM
Privacy:
🌐 Public
© 2025 Paperzilla. All rights reserved.

If you are not redirected automatically, click here.