PAPERZILLA
Crunching Academic Papers into Bite-sized Insights.
About
Sign Out
← Back to papers

Life SciencesAgricultural and Biological SciencesGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Increasing high school teachers self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice
SHARE
Overview
Paper Summary
Conflicts of Interest
Identified Weaknesses
Rating Explanation
Good to know
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Paper Summary
Paperzilla title
Science Teachers Get a Confidence Boost from Bugs and 3D-Printed Lures, but E.T. Teachers? Meh.
Science teachers' self-efficacy significantly increased after participating in a professional development program focused on integrated STEM instruction, particularly after implementing the learned concepts in their classrooms. However, engineering technology teachers did not experience a similar boost, potentially due to pre-existing high confidence levels.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
The study acknowledges funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF, award #DRL-1513248) but clarifies that the findings do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. No other conflicts were identified.
Identified Weaknesses
Small Sample Size
The limited sample size (maximum 15 participants per year for the experimental group and 10 for the control) restricts the generalizability of the findings. Small sample sizes can lead to low statistical power, increasing the risk of not detecting a significant effect when one exists, thus limiting the robustness of conclusions.
Self-Selecting Control Group
The self-selecting nature of the control group introduces potential bias. While they applied to participate, their inability to attend the summer program might correlate with other factors influencing self-efficacy, making it difficult to isolate the intervention's true impact.
Self-Reported Data
Relying solely on self-reported data through the T-STEM survey introduces potential bias. Participants might overestimate or underestimate their self-efficacy, affecting the accuracy of the measurements and potentially skewing the results.
Limited Geographical Scope
The study is geographically limited to a rural region in a Midwestern state, which restricts the generalizability of the findings to different educational contexts or teacher populations. Teacher experiences and support systems can vary significantly, making it difficult to extrapolate the results.
Rating Explanation
This study presents interesting findings on the impact of an integrated STEM professional development program on teacher self-efficacy. The Wilcoxon tests reveal significant improvement for science teachers, particularly after implementing their lessons. However, the significant methodological limitations, such as the small sample size, self-selection bias in the control group, reliance on self-reported data, and limited geographical scope, constrain the strength and generalizability of the findings, thus justifying an average rating of 3.
Good to know
This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →
File Information
Original Title:
Increasing high school teachers self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice
File Name:
s40594-020-00211-w.pdf
[download]
File Size:
0.76 MB
Uploaded:
July 14, 2025 at 10:48 AM
Privacy:
🌐 Public
© 2025 Paperzilla. All rights reserved.

If you are not redirected automatically, click here.