Limited measure of exposure
The study uses the number of people living within the burned area as a measure of exposure, but this doesn't account for the varying levels of impact a fire can have. For instance, a small, intense fire near a densely populated area could be more devastating than a large, low-intensity fire in a sparsely populated area. Additionally, indirect impacts, like smoke exposure, are not considered.
Correlation does not equal causation
The study correlates population growth with increased exposure, but doesn't disentangle other societal factors, like urban expansion and land management practices, that could be contributing. This makes it difficult to isolate the specific role of population growth in driving the observed trend.