PAPERZILLA
Crunching Academic Papers into Bite-sized Insights.
About
Sign Out
← Back to papers

Health SciencesMedicineGastroenterology

Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death

SHARE

Overview

Paper Summary
Conflicts of Interest
Identified Weaknesses
Rating Explanation
Good to know
Topic Hierarchy
File Information

Paper Summary

Paperzilla title
Colonoscopy Screening: It Helps, But Not as Much as We Hoped!
This large randomized trial showed that inviting people for colonoscopy screening reduced their risk of colorectal cancer by 18% over 10 years. However, the benefit for preventing death from colorectal cancer was not statistically significant, and the overall benefit for cancer prevention was lower than anticipated.

Possible Conflicts of Interest

Funding was received from a variety of sources, including the Research Council of Norway, Nordic Cancer Union, Norwegian Cancer Society, Health Fund of South-East Norway, Dr. Falk Pharma (provided bowel preparation free of charge in Norway), Polish-Norwegian Research Program, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Polish Foundation of Gastroenterology, Dutch Ministry of Health and Health Care Prevention, Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, Center for Translational Molecular Medicine, Swedish Cancer Foundation, Regional forskningsfond i Uppsala-Örebro regionen, and Afa. While these diverse sources limit the influence of any single entity, the potential for funding bias cannot be completely ruled out.

Identified Weaknesses

Lower than expected participation
Participation in the screening group varied between countries (33%-61%) and was lower than initially anticipated, which could affect the generalizability of the results and might underestimate the true benefit of screening.
Lack of statistical significance for mortality benefit
While the study found a reduction in colorectal cancer cases, the reduction in deaths specifically due to colorectal cancer wasn't statistically significant at the 10-year mark. Longer follow-up may be needed to determine this.
Lack of information about adherence to polyp surveillance
The study didn't collect information on whether participants followed recommendations for polyp surveillance after screening, which could influence long-term outcomes.

Rating Explanation

This is a large, well-designed randomized controlled trial that provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer. While the study has some limitations, including lower-than-expected participation rates and a lack of mortality benefit at the 10-year follow-up, the rigorous methodology and long-term follow-up make it a significant contribution to the field. The acknowledged funding sources and comprehensive handling of potential conflicts warrant a rating of 4.

Good to know

This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →

Topic Hierarchy

Field:
Medicine

File Information

Original Title:
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death
File Name:
paper_1130.pdf
[download]
File Size:
0.68 MB
Uploaded:
September 05, 2025 at 12:48 PM
Privacy:
🌐 Public
© 2025 Paperzilla. All rights reserved.

If you are not redirected automatically, click here.