← Back to papers

THE EMPLOYMENT EFFECTS OF A GUARANTEED INCOME: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FROM TWO U.S. STATES

★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

Overview

Paper Summary › Explain Like I'm Five › Conflicts of Interest › Identified Limitations › Rating Explanation › Good to know › Topic Hierarchy › File Information ›

Paper Summary

Paperzilla title
A Thousand Bucks a Month? They Worked Less, Chilled More, and Got a Little More Entrepreneurial (Maybe)

This study examines the effects of a three-year unconditional cash transfer of $1,000 per month on low-income individuals in two US states. The transfers led to a moderate decrease in work hours and earnings, with recipients primarily using the extra time for leisure. While there were no significant improvements in job quality or human capital investments overall, some suggestive evidence indicates younger participants may pursue more formal education and that individuals exhibit more interest in entrepreneurship as a result of the transfers.

Explain Like I'm Five

Giving low-income people $1,000 per month led them to work less and have slightly higher debt, but they also spent more time on leisure and showed greater interest in starting businesses.

Possible Conflicts of Interest

The authors acknowledge funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and private donors.

Identified Limitations

Limited generalizability to higher income groups
Although the study targeted a wide range of incomes (up to 300% of the Federal Poverty Level), the average household income of participants was still relatively low ($29,900). This limits the generalizability of the findings to higher income populations.
No long-term follow up
The study found no significant impact on quality of employment or human capital investments. While this is an important null finding, it leaves open the question of whether longer-term outcomes might differ.
Specific effect of unconditional vs. conditional or size of transfer is unknown
It's unclear whether the observed effects are due to the specific amount of the transfer or the fact that it was unconditional. Future research comparing different transfer amounts and conditions would be valuable.

Rating Explanation

This is a well-designed study with a large sample size and rigorous methodology (RCT) addressing an important policy question. The combination of survey, administrative, and mobile phone data allows for a comprehensive analysis of the impacts of unconditional cash transfers. Although there is no long-term follow up, and limited generalizability to higher-income populations, the study makes a significant contribution to the literature.

Good to know

This is the Starter analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.

Explore Pro →

File Information

Original Title: THE EMPLOYMENT EFFECTS OF A GUARANTEED INCOME: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FROM TWO U.S. STATES
Uploaded: August 09, 2025 at 12:43 PM
Privacy: Public