PAPERZILLA
Crunching Academic Papers into Bite-sized Insights.
About
Sign Out
← Back to papers

Health SciencesMedicineGastroenterology

Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline
SHARE
Overview
Paper Summary
Conflicts of Interest
Identified Weaknesses
Rating Explanation
Good to know
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Paper Summary
Paperzilla title
To Snip or Not to Snip: An Endoscopic Guide to Subepithelial Lesions
The guideline recommends endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) as the primary tool for characterizing subepithelial lesions (SELs). It suggests tissue diagnosis for SELs with GIST features if they are >20mm or high-risk, recommends endoscopic resection for growing type 1 gastric NENs, and advises against surveillance for most benign SELs if the diagnosis is clear.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
Some authors disclosed receiving lecture fees, honoraria, research support, and consulting fees from various medical device and pharmaceutical companies, such as Olympus, Erbe, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Medtronics, Abbvie, Novartis, Bayer, Deciphera, and Roche. While these are disclosed, they could represent a potential conflict of interest influencing recommendations related to specific procedures or devices.
Identified Weaknesses
Reliance on Retrospective Studies and Expert Opinions
This guideline is based mostly on retrospective studies and expert opinions, lacking robust evidence from randomized controlled trials. This weakens the strength of the recommendations and their generalizability to broader clinical settings.
Weak Recommendations and Low Quality Evidence
Several recommendations are graded as weak or with very low quality evidence, highlighting the limited or inconsistent data supporting these recommendations.
Potential for Overtreatment
The guideline acknowledges the potential for unnecessary resections of benign lesions, particularly with the increased availability of endoscopic resection techniques. This suggests that the guideline's criteria for resection may need refinement to ensure its application is appropriate and avoids overtreatment.
Lack of Comparative Data on Resection Techniques
The guideline lacks clear comparative data on different endoscopic resection techniques for several SEL subtypes. This makes it difficult to definitively recommend one technique over another in specific clinical scenarios.
Rating Explanation
This guideline provides valuable recommendations for managing subepithelial lesions and neuroendocrine neoplasms using endoscopy. Although based mainly on retrospective studies and expert opinion, it offers a structured approach to diagnosis, surveillance, and resection, addressing a clinically important area with limited high-quality evidence. The disclosed conflicts of interest are noted and considered in the rating.
Good to know
This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →
Topic Hierarchy
Field:
Medicine
File Information
Original Title:
Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline
File Name:
view.pdf
[download]
File Size:
0.90 MB
Uploaded:
July 14, 2025 at 11:12 AM
Privacy:
🌐 Public
© 2025 Paperzilla. All rights reserved.

If you are not redirected automatically, click here.