Medication errors in a health care facility in southern Saudi Arabia

★

☆

SHARE

Overview

Paper Summary

Conflicts of Interest

Identified Weaknesses

Rating Explanation

Good to know

Topic Hierarchy

File Information

Paper Summary

Paperzilla title

Oops! Duplicate Meds and Missing Info Top Medication Errors in Saudi Hospital

This study investigated medication errors at Aseer Central Hospital in Saudi Arabia. The most common prescribing errors were medication duplication (31.2%) and missing patient identifying information (25%), mostly occurring in inpatient prescriptions. Dispensing errors were less frequent (0.9%).

Possible Conflicts of Interest

None identified

Identified Weaknesses

Retrospective design

The study is limited by its retrospective design, relying on existing patient records which may have incomplete or inaccurate information. This can lead to misclassification of medication errors or underreporting of certain types of errors.

Limited generalizability

The study was conducted in a single healthcare facility in a specific region, which limits the generalizability of findings to other healthcare settings or populations. Different hospitals may have varying prescribing and dispensing practices, leading to different types and frequencies of medication errors.

Convenience sampling

The convenience sampling method employed in the study may have introduced selection bias, where certain types of patients or medication errors are overrepresented or underrepresented in the sample. This can affect the accuracy and representativeness of the study's findings.

Subjectivity of checklists

The study relies on checklists to identify medication errors, which can be subjective and prone to inter-rater variability. Different reviewers may have varying interpretations of what constitutes a medication error, leading to inconsistencies in data collection.

Rating Explanation

This study provides valuable insights into the types and frequency of medication errors in a specific healthcare setting. However, the methodological limitations, particularly the retrospective design and limited generalizability, restrict the strength of the conclusions. The study identifies a relevant issue and offers a descriptive overview, but the limitations prevent broader generalizations and causal inferences.

Good to know

This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.

Explore Pro →