The study's observational design limits causal inferences. While associations between later breakfast and mortality were found, it doesn't prove causation. Other factors could be at play.
Reliance on self-reported meal times and health behaviors introduces potential recall bias and inaccuracies, affecting the reliability of findings.
The study population consisted of community-dwelling older adults of primarily British European ancestry, limiting the generalizability of findings to other demographics and cultural contexts.
The study lacked detailed information on diet composition, portion sizes, and nutrient intake, which could confound the relationship between meal timing and health outcomes.
Potential Confounding Factors
While the study adjusted for some confounders like socioeconomic status and sleep, residual confounding from unmeasured lifestyle factors, such as physical activity or specific dietary habits, cannot be ruled out.
The long follow-up period (20 years) likely resulted in participant attrition and dropout, potentially introducing bias if those who dropped out had different meal timing patterns and health outcomes compared to those who remained.