Factors affecting the citations of papers in tribology journals

★

☆

SHARE

Overview

Paper Summary

Conflicts of Interest

Identified Weaknesses

Rating Explanation

Good to know

Topic Hierarchy

File Information

Paper Summary

Paperzilla title

Long Papers and Lots of References = More Citations (in Tribology, at Least!)

This study examined factors influencing citations of tribology papers, finding positive correlations with manuscript length and number of references. Other factors like authorship and open access showed varying effects. The study concludes that these non-scientific factors can influence citations but emphasizes responsible authorship and publication practices.

Possible Conflicts of Interest

None identified

Identified Weaknesses

Weak Correlation Strength

The study acknowledges the low R-squared values, indicating weak correlation strength. While a large sample size is used to argue for representativeness, the weak correlations suggest the analyzed factors have a limited influence on citation rates, raising questions about the robustness of the findings.

Over-Reliance on Citation Counts

While alternative metrics are mentioned, the study primarily relies on citation counts. This neglects the broader context of research impact and the limitations of citation-based metrics, which are increasingly recognized.

Limited Generalizability

The study focuses on tribology journals, limiting the generalizability of the findings to other disciplines. The influence of the analyzed factors on citations could vary significantly across different fields of research.

Incomplete Analysis of Influencing Factors

While some factors like manuscript length and number of references are considered, other potential factors (e.g., article novelty, research design, and methodological rigor) are not examined, which may play more important roles in determining citation count.

Rating Explanation

This study provides a decent analysis of factors affecting citation counts in tribology journals, but several limitations prevent a higher rating. The weak correlations, limited generalizability, over-reliance on citation counts, and incomplete analysis of factors suggest a need for further research. The study does offer some useful insights, but the conclusions are not particularly groundbreaking and should be interpreted with caution.

Good to know

This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.

Explore Pro →