← Back to papers

Net fiscal contributions of immigrant groups in Denmark and Finland are highly predictable from country of origin IQ and Muslim %

★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆

Overview

Paper Summary › Explain Like I'm Five › Conflicts of Interest › Identified Limitations › Rating Explanation › Good to know › Topic Hierarchy › File Information ›

Paper Summary

Paperzilla title
IQ, Muslim %, and Immigrant Finances: A Correlation Study with Small Samples

This study found correlations between immigrant groups' financial contributions in Denmark and Finland, their home countries' average IQ scores, and the percentage of Muslims in those countries. However, the small sample size (9 overlapping countries) and reliance on correlation without establishing causality limit the reliability of the findings.

Explain Like I'm Five

Immigrants' financial contributions to Denmark and Finland are linked to their home country's average IQ and Muslim percentage. Higher IQ is linked to better contributions, while higher Muslim percentage is linked to worse.

Possible Conflicts of Interest

None identified

Identified Limitations

Small Sample Size
The small sample size significantly reduces the study's statistical power. It becomes challenging to draw reliable conclusions that generalize to the wider population with such limited data.
Correlation Not Causation
The study does not establish a causal link but merely an association. Other factors related to a country's development and its citizens' values might explain the observed relationships.
Ecological Fallacy
Using national averages to predict individual behaviors is a simplification and may not accurately reflect individual variations within immigrant groups.
Inconsistent Age Adjustment
Age is a known confounder in fiscal studies, yet the Danish and Finnish data differ in how they account for age, making direct comparisons problematic.
Outlier Sensitivity
Syria was an outlier in the dataset, and its inclusion/exclusion significantly affects the results. This raises concerns about the analysis's sensitivity to specific circumstances.

Rating Explanation

The small sample size and reliance on correlations without establishing causality are significant methodological flaws. While the study explores an interesting relationship, these weaknesses limit the strength of the conclusions and warrant a low rating.

Good to know

This is the Starter analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.

Explore Pro →

File Information

Original Title: Net fiscal contributions of immigrant groups in Denmark and Finland are highly predictable from country of origin IQ and Muslim %
Uploaded: August 21, 2025 at 05:47 PM
Privacy: Public