On Anticompetitive Third-Degree Price Discrimination
Overview
Paper Summary
This paper finds that third-degree price discrimination (local store pricing) in supermarkets more often decreases output and welfare compared to uniform pricing. This contradicts the common belief that price discrimination benefits consumers. Using output as a proxy for welfare overestimates the benefits and underestimates the potential harm of price discrimination.
Explain Like I'm Five
Scientists found that when supermarkets charge different people different prices for the same food, it usually means less food is sold overall and it's actually not good for most shoppers, even though many thought it would be.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
The author acknowledges support by the National Science Foundation, but no other potential conflicts of interest are identified.
Identified Limitations
Rating Explanation
This paper makes a valuable contribution to the literature on price discrimination by providing empirical evidence challenging the long-held view that third-degree price discrimination is generally beneficial. The methodology is rigorous, involving nonparametric estimation of demand and evaluation of curvature conditions. While the simplified model and limited generalizability are weaknesses, the scale of the analysis and the robustness of the findings across product categories make this a strong study.
Good to know
This is the Starter analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →