After fragmentation: Norm collisions, interface conflicts, and conflict management
Descripción general
Resumen del artículo
The study finds that norm collisions and institutional overlaps in international law do not inevitably lead to fragmentation or chaos. Instead, they frequently lead to cooperative forms of conflict management that generate inter-institutional order, though the normative quality of this order remains contested. The authors propose an 'interface conflict' framework for analyzing these dynamics.
Explícamelo como si tuviera cinco años
Scientists found that when different rules from different groups or countries bump into each other, things don't always get messy. Instead, they often work together to make a new system, even if people still argue if the new system is fair.
Posibles conflictos de intereses
None identified
Limitaciones identificadas
Explicación de la calificación
This paper introduces a valuable framework for studying norm collisions in international law. The interface conflict framework and its micro-level approach provides a nuanced understanding of how overlaps and collisions are activated and managed. The analysis of conflict management types is particularly insightful, showing how collisions can be creative of order. While there are limitations, the theoretical contribution and empirical findings are significant enough to warrant a strong rating.
Conviene saber
Este es el análisis de Starter. Paperzilla Pro verifica cada cita, investiga los antecedentes de los autores y las fuentes de financiación, y utiliza razonamiento avanzado con IA para ofrecer información más exhaustiva.
Explorar Pro →