Lack of Empirical Validation
The proposed three-pass method is presented as a practical guide based on the author's extensive experience, but the paper does not offer empirical data or studies to validate its effectiveness, efficiency, or superiority over other reading methods. Its benefits are asserted rather than demonstrated with scientific evidence.
Subjectivity in Application
The guidance, particularly for the 'five Cs' in the first pass and the depth of understanding expected at each stage, can be subjective. The success of the method heavily relies on the reader's existing knowledge, discernment, and ability to self-assess their comprehension, which might be challenging for novice researchers for whom the paper is primarily intended.
Generalization Across Disciplines
While the method is broadly applicable, specific research disciplines might have unique paper structures, dense mathematical proofs, or highly specialized terminology that could alter the optimal application or timing of each pass, which is not deeply explored.