← Back to papers

Further improvement in London's air quality demands more than the Ultra Low Emission Zone policy

★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

Overview

Paper Summary › Explain Like I'm Five › Conflicts of Interest › Identified Limitations › Rating Explanation › Good to know › Topic Hierarchy › File Information ›

Paper Summary

Paperzilla title
London's Clean Air Zone: First Round Knockout, Second Round Flop!

The 2019 Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ1) significantly reduced nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) in central London and had positive spillover effects, though its impact on fine particulate matter (PM2.5) was limited. However, the city-wide expansion in 2023 (ULEZ3) showed no detectable impact on air pollution, and overall NO2 and PM2.5 levels remain well above World Health Organization guidelines, indicating ULEZ alone is insufficient to achieve truly clean air.

Explain Like I'm Five

London tried to clean its air by charging older, dirtier cars. The first attempt helped a bit with some pollutants, but a bigger expansion didn't do much, and the air is still not as clean as health experts recommend.

Possible Conflicts of Interest

None identified

Identified Limitations

Exclusion of ULEZ2 Expansion
The first ULEZ expansion in 2021 (ULEZ2) was excluded from the analysis due to its overlap with the COVID-19 lockdown, which limits a complete evaluation of the ULEZ policy's phased implementation.
Limited PM2.5 Impact
ULEZ1 showed very limited impact on fine particulate matter (PM2.5), especially at urban background sites, and ULEZ3 had no detectable impact. This is crucial as PM2.5 is a major health concern and road transport is a relatively minor source compared to industrial, commercial, and domestic emissions.
No Detectable Impact from ULEZ3 Expansion
The city-wide ULEZ expansion (ULEZ3) in 2023 showed no statistically significant changes in NO2, NOx, or PM2.5. This indicates a significant limitation in the policy's effectiveness for further air quality improvement.
Air Quality Still Below WHO Guidelines
Despite ULEZ implementation, NO2 and PM2.5 levels across London remained substantially above World Health Organization air quality guidelines, highlighting that the policy alone is insufficient for achieving health-protective air quality.
Confounding Factors for ULEZ3 Evaluation
The ULEZ3 implementation occurred post-pandemic, when commuting patterns had already shifted, and a substantial scrappage scheme might have encouraged compliant vehicle adoption before ULEZ3, potentially masking the direct impact of the expansion itself.

Rating Explanation

This paper employs a robust causal inference framework with weather normalization and a synthetic control method to evaluate a major urban policy. The findings are significant for policy-making, clearly demonstrating the initial success of ULEZ1 but the subsequent lack of impact for ULEZ3, and highlighting the complexity of urban air pollution. While the exclusion of ULEZ2 is a minor limitation, it is justified by confounding factors.

Good to know

This is the Starter analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.

Explore Pro →

File Information

Original Title: Further improvement in London's air quality demands more than the Ultra Low Emission Zone policy
Uploaded: October 22, 2025 at 06:47 PM
Privacy: Public