PAPERZILLA
Crunching Academic Papers into Bite-sized Insights.
About
Sign Out
← Back to papers
Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Super Bowls: Serving Bowl Size and Food Consumption
★
★
★
☆
☆
SHARE
Overview
Paper Summary
Conflicts of Interest
Identified Weaknesses
Rating Explanation
Good to know
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Paper Summary
Paperzilla title
Bowl Size Matters: Use Smaller Bowls for Smaller Waistlines (Maybe?)
People served themselves and ate significantly more snacks from larger serving bowls compared to smaller ones. This effect was independent of factors like body weight and time since the last meal, suggesting that bowl size itself acts as a visual cue influencing consumption.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
None identified
Identified Weaknesses
Limited generalizability
The study lacks generalizability due to a small and specific sample (graduate students attending a Super Bowl party). This makes it hard to apply the findings to other populations or eating contexts.
Limited food variety
The single food choice (snack mix) limits the conclusions that can be drawn. People might react differently to serving bowl size depending on the type of food offered.
Confounding factors
The study doesn't fully address other potential influences on food intake, such as social dynamics, pre-party eating habits, or individual hunger levels.
Limited measurement of consumption
The study measured intake immediately after serving, not overall consumption during the party. This doesn't account for potential refills or changes in eating behavior as the event progresses.
Uncontrolled covariates
Although the study mentioned using body weight, time since last meal, age, and education as covariates, there might be other unreported/unmeasured covariates that could have influenced the results.
Rating Explanation
The study presents an interesting finding about the influence of bowl size on food intake. However, several methodological limitations, particularly the limited generalizability and potential confounding factors, prevent a higher rating. The retraction by JAMA due to the author's misconduct further reduces confidence in the results.
Good to know
This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Original Title:
Super Bowls: Serving Bowl Size and Food Consumption
File Name:
SuperBowls-JAMA2005.pdf
[download]
File Size:
0.10 MB
Uploaded:
July 08, 2025 at 11:41 AM
Privacy:
🌐 Public
© 2025 Paperzilla. All rights reserved.