PAPERZILLA
Crunching Academic Papers into Bite-sized Insights.
About
Sign Out
← Back to papers

Physical SciencesComputer ScienceComputational Theory and Mathematics

Scientific Machine Learning Through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's Next
SHARE
Overview
Paper Summary
Conflicts of Interest
Identified Weaknesses
Rating Explanation
Good to know
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Paper Summary
Paperzilla title
PINNs: The Equation-Whispering Neural Networks (But Still Some Math Problems)
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) offer a novel approach to solving partial differential equations by incorporating physical laws into the learning process. While promising for various applications, including fluid dynamics, optics, and material science, PINNs face challenges related to theoretical understanding, computational cost, and accuracy in complex physical phenomena.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
None identified
Identified Weaknesses
Insufficient research on non-FFNN architectures
Limited exploration of non-FFNN types, despite their potential theoretical impact on PINNs.
Lack of theoretical depth in Stefan problem analysis
Limited theoretical analysis, including approximation error and numerical stability, regarding Stefan problems and similar complex functions.
Limited transferability due to emphasis on examples over abstract analysis
Over-reliance on specific numerical examples, with less emphasis on abstract analysis, potentially impacting transferability.
Theoretical ambiguity in soft constraint usage
Lack of formal analysis of soft constraints, which introduces ambiguity in accuracy and theoretical backing.
High computational cost for complex problems
Computational cost can be high, especially for 3D and multi-scale problems, which require higher capacity networks and longer training times.
Information propagation challenges
Difficulty in propagating information from initial/boundary conditions to unseen areas, potentially impacting predictive accuracy.
Limited application in multi-scale and climate modeling
Lack of PINN applications in multi-scale applications and climate modeling, despite demonstrations in other areas like bubble dynamics.
Accuracy limitations in complex physical phenomena
PINNs can fail to approximate solutions accurately for complex physical phenomena like multi-scale, chaotic, or turbulent behavior, especially when convection or viscosity coefficients are high.
Challenges in solving high-frequency and multi-scale PDEs
PINNs may struggle with high-frequency or multi-scale PDEs due to increasing complexity of the loss landscape and the optimization problem.
Rating Explanation
This review provides a comprehensive overview of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), covering their architecture, applications, software, and future directions. It effectively synthesizes the current state of research, highlighting both strengths and weaknesses, which is valuable for researchers in the field. While theoretical limitations and computational costs remain challenges, the potential of PINNs in various scientific domains warrants a strong rating.
Good to know
This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →
File Information
Original Title:
Scientific Machine Learning Through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's Next
File Name:
s10915-022-01939-z.pdf
[download]
File Size:
1.46 MB
Uploaded:
July 14, 2025 at 05:25 PM
Privacy:
🌐 Public
© 2025 Paperzilla. All rights reserved.

If you are not redirected automatically, click here.