Insufficient research on non-FFNN architectures
Limited exploration of non-FFNN types, despite their potential theoretical impact on PINNs.
Lack of theoretical depth in Stefan problem analysis
Limited theoretical analysis, including approximation error and numerical stability, regarding Stefan problems and similar complex functions.
Limited transferability due to emphasis on examples over abstract analysis
Over-reliance on specific numerical examples, with less emphasis on abstract analysis, potentially impacting transferability.
Theoretical ambiguity in soft constraint usage
Lack of formal analysis of soft constraints, which introduces ambiguity in accuracy and theoretical backing.
High computational cost for complex problems
Computational cost can be high, especially for 3D and multi-scale problems, which require higher capacity networks and longer training times.
Information propagation challenges
Difficulty in propagating information from initial/boundary conditions to unseen areas, potentially impacting predictive accuracy.
Limited application in multi-scale and climate modeling
Lack of PINN applications in multi-scale applications and climate modeling, despite demonstrations in other areas like bubble dynamics.
Accuracy limitations in complex physical phenomena
PINNs can fail to approximate solutions accurately for complex physical phenomena like multi-scale, chaotic, or turbulent behavior, especially when convection or viscosity coefficients are high.
Challenges in solving high-frequency and multi-scale PDEs
PINNs may struggle with high-frequency or multi-scale PDEs due to increasing complexity of the loss landscape and the optimization problem.