An organization- and category-level comparison of diagnostic requirements for mental disorders in ICD-11 and DSM-5
Overview
Paper Summary
This paper compares the ICD-11 and DSM-5 classifications of mental disorders, finding substantial similarity overall, especially compared to previous versions. Key differences are driven by the differing priorities of the WHO (public health) and APA (diagnostic precision), leading to variations in disorder inclusion, diagnostic criteria, and operationalization. Despite these differences, the authors argue that the divergence promotes research and can improve the validity of diagnostic concepts.
Explain Like I'm Five
Scientists looked at two big rulebooks doctors use to understand feelings and brains, and found they are mostly the same but have tiny differences. These small differences actually help scientists learn even more about how to help people.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
The authors disclosed that they were chairs, members, or consultants to ICD-11 Working Groups, with the exception of two authors who were members of the WHO Secretariat.
Rating Explanation
This is a high-quality review meticulously comparing the ICD-11 and DSM-5, offering valuable insights for practitioners and researchers. The detailed analysis and clear explanations enhance understanding of the two systems. The disclosed COI is noted but doesn't significantly detract from the value of the work.
Good to know
This is the Starter analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →