Reliance on self-reported measures
The study relies on self-reported measures for several key outcomes, including QIDS-SR, M3VAS, SHAPS, and TEPS, and subjective reports were used to assess the peak drug effects. These subjective measures can be influenced by a variety of factors, including participant expectations and recall biases, which may introduce variability and potentially reduce the reliability of the findings.
Missing data and data imputation
The TEPS-A subscale had missing data for some participants at the pre-dose time point, requiring data imputation. While imputation can be a useful tool to address missing data, it can introduce some bias and uncertainty into the analysis, which may affect the validity of the findings related to the TEPS-A subscale.
Relatively short interval between visits
The time interval between study visits (19 days) was shorter than in some previous studies (33 days), which may have resulted in symptoms not fully returning to baseline. This may have reduced the impact of ketamine's effects and attenuated differences between naltrexone and placebo conditions, potentially underestimating the effects of naltrexone on ketamine's antidepressant properties.
The study used racemic ketamine, meaning it contained both S-ketamine and R-ketamine enantiomers. These two forms may have distinct mechanisms of action and interactions with the opioid system, and the study could not differentiate their contributions.
The study did not include a placebo infusion arm, making it impossible to discern whether naltrexone modulates placebo effects on brain activity or clinical measures. This limits the interpretation of the results, as it is difficult to fully isolate the effects of naltrexone on ketamine without comparing them to a placebo-only group.
1H-fMRS methodological limitations
The 'H-fMRS sequence did not include interleaved unsuppressed water acquisitions. This means the data is not water scaled, which may lead to reduced quantitative accuracy in metabolite concentrations, and makes it more difficult to make comparisons with previous data that was acquired with different methodologies.