PAPERZILLA
Crunching Academic Papers into Bite-sized Insights.
About
Sign Out
← Back to papers

Health SciencesHealth ProfessionsPharmacy

The roles of experienced and internalized weight stigma in healthcare experiences: Perspectives of adults engaged in weight management across six countries
SHARE
Overview
Paper Summary
Conflicts of Interest
Identified Weaknesses
Rating Explanation
Good to know
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Paper Summary
Paperzilla title
Weight Stigma: A Global Healthcare Headache - Internalized Bias Predicts Bad Experiences in Six Countries
Internalized weight bias (WBI) is a stronger predictor of negative healthcare experiences than simply experiencing weight stigma. People with higher WBI in six Western countries reported avoiding doctors, feeling judged, and having lower quality care. Weight stigma from doctors is extremely common, impacting care even after accounting for BMI.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
The study received funding from WW International (formerly Weight Watchers), and one of the authors (GDF) is an employee and shareholder of WW. While this funding source and affiliation represent potential conflicts of interest, it's important to note that the authors acknowledge these connections and claim adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Identified Weaknesses
Cross-sectional design
The cross-sectional nature of the study prevents causal conclusions and requires longitudinal examination to establish the directionality of associations between weight stigma and healthcare experiences.
Self-reported data
Reliance on self-reported recall of stigma and healthcare experiences introduces potential for self-report bias and may not fully capture the complexity of these phenomena.
Limited validation of measures
The study's measure of internalized weight bias has not been validated in all languages used in the study, limiting the generalizability of findings related to this construct across all countries.
Limited sample diversity
The sample primarily consisted of White women of middle age, restricting the generalizability of findings to more diverse multinational samples with varying demographic characteristics.
Low response rate
The low response rate prevents generalizing findings to all members of the weight management program or those seeking treatment.
Data collection during pandemic
Data collection during the COVID-19 pandemic may have influenced participant responses and the survey response rate, limiting the generalizability of findings to non-pandemic contexts.
Rating Explanation
This study is the first multinational investigation of the associations between weight stigma and healthcare experiences, making a significant contribution to the field. The use of identical measures and comparable samples across countries strengthens the study's rigor, allowing for meaningful comparisons and providing valuable insights into the consistency of findings across different Western countries. The identification of internalized weight bias as a key predictor of adverse healthcare experiences is a novel and important finding. While the study's limitations regarding causality and sample diversity warrant consideration, the overall quality and impact of the research merit a strong rating. The conflict of interest is noted, but does not fundamentally compromise the methodology.
Good to know
This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Original Title:
The roles of experienced and internalized weight stigma in healthcare experiences: Perspectives of adults engaged in weight management across six countries
File Name:
file.pdf
[download]
File Size:
0.95 MB
Uploaded:
July 14, 2025 at 10:43 AM
Privacy:
🌐 Public
© 2025 Paperzilla. All rights reserved.

If you are not redirected automatically, click here.