Reliance on Oral Tradition
The dependence on oral traditions passed down through generations introduces potential inaccuracies and biases. While oral traditions can hold valuable historical information, they are also subject to change and embellishment over time, making it difficult to determine the precise details of the original event.
The lack of a confirmed impact crater weakens the impact hypothesis. While small craters could have been obscured by subsequent geological processes or lie undiscovered, the absence of definitive crater evidence leaves room for alternative explanations for the observed destruction.
Lack of Evidence for City-Wide Fire
The claim of a city-wide conflagration lacks specific evidence beyond ash and charcoal. While these materials indicate fire, the extent and intensity of the fire, as well as its role in the destruction, need further clarification.
Uncertainty Regarding Human Remains
The uncertainty surrounding the human remains, especially the missing 90% of the two skeletons found on the upper ring road, limits interpretations. The cause of death, the processes that led to their disarticulation and dispersal, and the fate of the missing remains need further investigation.
Uncertainty about Salt Influx
The high salt concentrations in the destruction layer, while suggestive of a salt water influx, lack definitive evidence linking it to the airburst/impact. Further investigation is needed to determine the source of the salt and the processes that led to its deposition.
Reliance on Hypothesized Models
The study relies on hypothesized models for the airburst, with insufficient evidence to conclusively determine the exact scenario. While the models are consistent with the observed evidence, the lack of precise data about the impactor's size, composition, and trajectory introduces uncertainty.
Speculative Connection to Sodom
The paper's discussion of a potential connection between the destruction of Tall el-Hammam and the biblical story of Sodom is speculative. While it's an intriguing possibility, the lack of definitive archaeological or textual evidence makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions.