PAPERZILLA
Crunching Academic Papers into Bite-sized Insights.
About
Sign Out
← Back to papers

Physical SciencesComputer ScienceArtificial Intelligence

STEPWISER: STEPWISE GENERATIVE JUDGES FOR WISER REASONING

SHARE

Overview

Paper Summary
Conflicts of Interest
Identified Weaknesses
Rating Explanation
Good to know
Topic Hierarchy
File Information

Paper Summary

Paperzilla title
AI Judge Grades AI's Math Homework (And Helps It Get Better Grades)
This paper proposes STEPWISER, a generative judge model trained with reinforcement learning, to evaluate the intermediate reasoning steps of large language models solving math problems. Experiments show that STEPWISER outperforms existing methods on ProcessBench, an automated benchmark for evaluating stepwise judgments. It also demonstrates improved performance in inference-time search for generating math solutions and in selecting high-quality training data.

Possible Conflicts of Interest

The authors are affiliated with Meta AI Research and other academic institutions. While no direct conflict of interest related to the research itself is apparent, the affiliation with Meta could potentially influence the choice of models and datasets used for experiments.

Identified Weaknesses

Limited Generalizability
The experiments were conducted using specific large language models (Qwen2.5-1.5B-it and Qwen2.5-7B-it) and a specific dataset (NuminaMath-CoT). This raises concerns about the generalizability of the findings to other models and datasets. It is unclear whether STEPWISER would perform as well with different models or on problems outside of the mathematical domain.
Over-Reliance on Automated Metrics
The evaluation of STEPWISER relies heavily on automated metrics like ProcessBench and accuracy on mathematical problem-solving datasets. While these metrics offer some insights, they may not fully capture the nuances of human-like reasoning and judgment. Further evaluation involving human assessment of the judge's quality would be beneficial.
Computational Cost
Training STEPWISER is computationally expensive, especially with larger models, requiring substantial resources. This could limit its accessibility and practicality for researchers with limited computational budgets.

Rating Explanation

This paper presents a novel approach to improving the reasoning abilities of large language models. The methodology is well-designed, and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of STEPWISER in various applications. However, limitations regarding generalizability and computational cost prevent a perfect score.

Good to know

This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →

Topic Hierarchy

File Information

Original Title:
STEPWISER: STEPWISE GENERATIVE JUDGES FOR WISER REASONING
File Name:
paper_704.pdf
[download]
File Size:
0.81 MB
Uploaded:
August 27, 2025 at 03:29 AM
Privacy:
🌐 Public
© 2025 Paperzilla. All rights reserved.

If you are not redirected automatically, click here.