← Back to papers

The contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to the global protein supply

★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆

Paper Summary

Paperzilla title
Fish and Chips: Not as Big a Protein Player as You Might Think!

Fish and aquaculture contributed about 15.3% of the global animal-source protein for human consumption in 2018, with finfish being the primary source. Although aquaculture now produces a greater weight of aquatic animals, the protein contribution from capture fisheries was slightly higher due to differences in meat yields and protein concentrations. The study emphasizes the need for increased aquaculture production to meet growing protein demands but also highlights the environmental and food security challenges associated with using wild fish for feed.

Explain Like I'm Five

Scientists found that fish, whether caught in the ocean or raised on farms, give people a lot of the protein their bodies need to grow big and strong. Even though we farm lots of fish now, the fish caught in the wild still give us slightly more of this important protein.

Possible Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest, but the research was supported by a grant from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation to the World Wildlife Fund. While this doesn't necessarily indicate bias, it's worth noting that WWF has a strong interest in promoting sustainable seafood practices.

Identified Limitations

Reliance on Potentially Inaccurate Data
The study relies heavily on FAO data, which has known limitations and potential inaccuracies, particularly regarding data from China. This raises concerns about the reliability of the global protein production estimates.
Limited Representation of Actual Consumption
The study uses commercial processing data for meat yields, which may not reflect actual consumption patterns due to variations in home and on-farm processing and consumer preferences. This could lead to skewed estimates of protein yields.
Crude Protein as a Comparison Metric
The study acknowledges the limitations of using crude protein as a comparison metric due to overestimation of true protein and variations in protein quality among sources. While it argues that these differences don't invalidate the comparison, they still introduce uncertainty.
Limited Discussion of Solutions
While the study highlights the negative impacts of using wild fish for aquaculture feed, it doesn't fully address the complexity of transitioning to alternative feed sources or the potential challenges of increasing seaweed and mollusc production.
Uncertain Future Projections
The study's projection of future aquaculture production needs is based on status quo consumption, which may not be realistic given changing dietary preferences and potential shifts in protein demand.

Rating Explanation

This study provides a useful overview of the contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to the global protein supply, but several methodological limitations, particularly the reliance on potentially inaccurate data and simplified protein comparisons, prevent a higher rating. The discussion of implications and future directions could also be more robust.

Good to know

This is the Starter analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.

Explore Pro →

Topic Hierarchy

Domain: Life Sciences
Subfield: Aquatic Science

File Information

Original Title: The contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to the global protein supply
Uploaded: July 14, 2025 at 10:43 AM
Privacy: Public