← Back to papers

Wire and arc additive manufacturing: Opportunities and challenges to control the quality and accuracy of manufactured parts

★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

Overview

Paper Summary › Explain Like I'm Five › Conflicts of Interest › Identified Limitations › Rating Explanation › Good to know › Topic Hierarchy › File Information ›

Paper Summary

Paperzilla title
WAAMing Through Geometry: How to Print Big Metal Stuff (Mostly Thin Walls) with Fewer Defects

Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) holds great promise for creating large metal parts, but challenges remain in controlling part quality and accuracy, especially geometric features like thin walls and overhangs. This review analyzes how heat management, process planning, and parameter selection influence part quality, dimensional accuracy, and common defects like porosity and humping, proposing future research directions focused on overcoming these limitations and expanding WAAM's geometrical capabilities.

Explain Like I'm Five

Scientists are figuring out how to "print" big metal objects by melting wire. It's tricky to make them perfect, sometimes they aren't quite the right shape or have tiny holes, so scientists are learning how to build them better.

Possible Conflicts of Interest

The authors acknowledge funding from the Materials innovation institute M2i and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, as well as support from industrial partners and the Rotterdam Fieldlab Additive Manufacturing BV. While these affiliations could represent potential biases, the broad scope of the review and inclusion of a diverse range of studies mitigate this risk.

Identified Limitations

Limited Scope
The review focuses on the geometric aspects of WAAM and doesn't consider other vital areas of the process such as mechanical and microstructural properties, mass transfer phenomena, topology optimization modeling, in-process monitoring, and design methodologies.
Inadequate Treatment of Residual Stress
While the paper emphasizes residual stress and its significance in WAAM, it does not adequately address the complex interplay of factors contributing to residual stress or offer concrete solutions for mitigation. This limits the practical applicability of the findings.
Lack of Original Analysis
The review relies heavily on listing and summarizing existing studies rather than providing original insights or analysis. This leads to a lack of clear conclusions and specific actionable recommendations for future research and process improvements.

Rating Explanation

This comprehensive review provides a valuable summary of the state of the art in WAAM, focusing specifically on the crucial area of geometric quality and accuracy. Despite some limitations in scope and original analysis, the paper effectively identifies key challenges and summarizes existing research efforts, making it a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners in the field. The acknowledged funding and collaborations represent a potential, though mitigated, conflict of interest.

Good to know

This is the Starter analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.

Explore Pro →

File Information

Original Title: Wire and arc additive manufacturing: Opportunities and challenges to control the quality and accuracy of manufactured parts
Uploaded: July 14, 2025 at 05:08 PM
Privacy: Public