Reliance on Simulations and Synthetic Data
While Robix is tested in real-world scenarios, much of its training relies on simulated and synthetic data, which may not fully capture the complexity and unpredictability of real-world environments. This could limit its robustness and adaptability in truly novel situations.
Limited Real-World Testing
The real-world testing, while present, is limited to a few specific tasks and environments. More extensive and diverse testing is needed to fully validate its capabilities and generalizability across a wider range of robot platforms and tasks.
Latency Issues with Commercial Comparisons
The paper highlights latency issues with commercial models like Gemini, but doesn't offer a direct latency comparison with Robix under the same conditions. This makes it harder to assess Robix's real-time performance advantages definitively.
Black Box Evaluation of Reasoning Quality
The quality of the reasoning traces is evaluated using another LLM (Qwen-2.5-32B), essentially creating a "black box" evaluation. A more transparent and human-interpretable evaluation method would be beneficial.
Robix uses short-term context windows, limiting its ability to retain information over extended periods. This hinders performance in scenarios requiring long-term planning or interaction memory.