The framework excels at loco-manipulation tasks but the paper acknowledges that more complex interactions, such as those involving deformable objects or human-robot collaboration, remain unexplored. This limits the current generalizability to these specific types of interactions.
Generalizability to Long-Horizon and Diverse Real-World Environments
While sim-to-real transfer is demonstrated for tested scenarios, the authors state that scaling to tasks requiring longer duration or highly varied real-world conditions may demand further advancements in domain randomization and adaptive control, suggesting current limitations in universal robustness.
Reliance on Egocentric Vision Challenges
The robot's onboard RealSense camera provides noisy depth images and can experience slight drift. Although mitigation strategies like spatial/temporal filtering and masking are employed, these indicate inherent challenges with real-world egocentric visual input that could affect performance in highly variable or unpredictable environments.
Controlled vs. Outdoor Environment Demonstrations
While outdoor experiments for box-pushing are shown, many of the core demonstrations and some real-world tasks (Lift Box, Kick Ball, Kick Box) appear to be conducted in more controlled laboratory settings. This might limit the robustness claims for all tasks in completely unstructured, varied outdoor conditions.
Limited Dexterous Manipulation Focus
The framework primarily focuses on loco-manipulation, which involves moving the robot's whole body to interact with objects. It does not extensively cover fine-grained dexterous manipulation that might require more intricate hand movements or tool use.