Adjectival Constitutionalism
Overview
Paper Summary
This article analyzes the use of adjectives in constitutional scholarship, arguing that they can refer to a topic, a model of government, a mode of change, or a discourse. It explores how these different uses can overlap and create conceptual confusion, especially between models and discourses, leading to utopian or abusive applications of constitutional ideas.
Explain Like I'm Five
Scholars use adjectives to describe different kinds of constitutions and changes. Sometimes these labels create confusion between ideals and reality, or are used to justify power grabs.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
None identified
Identified Limitations
Rating Explanation
The article provides a valuable conceptual framework for understanding the diverse uses of adjectives in constitutional scholarship. While lacking empirical support, it raises important questions about the potential for conceptual confusion and the strategic deployment of constitutional discourses. This framework could be useful for future research on the topic.
Good to know
This is the Starter analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →