PAPERZILLA
Crunching Academic Papers into Bite-sized Insights.
About
Sign Out
← Back to papers
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics
Why general artificial intelligence will not be realized
★
★
☆
☆
☆
SHARE
Overview
Paper Summary
Conflicts of Interest
Identified Weaknesses
Rating Explanation
Good to know
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Paper Summary
Paperzilla title
Are Computers Philosophers Yet? (Spoiler: Nope)
The author argues against the possibility of achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) because computers lack embodiment, lived experience, and the ability to interact with the world like humans. The paper claims that recent advancements in AI, while impressive, are limited to narrow applications (ANI) and do not represent progress towards true general intelligence.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
None identified
Identified Weaknesses
Philosophical rather than scientific argument
The author's argument against AGI hinges on the idea that computers are "not in the world," lacking embodiment and lived experience. This is a philosophical argument, not a scientific one, and doesn't address the practical progress and potential of AI research.
Disregarding ANI advancements
The author dismisses advancements in ANI as irrelevant to AGI, but progress in narrow AI can contribute to the development of more general AI capabilities.
Misrepresentation of opposing views
The author oversimplifies the arguments of AI proponents, misrepresenting their views on causality and the potential of AI. This creates a straw man argument, weakening the overall analysis.
Selective use of evidence
The examples provided are cherry-picked to support the author's argument, focusing on early Turing test failures and overlooking advancements in areas like natural language processing and computer vision.
Overly strong claim without sufficient evidence
The author claims that the goal of AGI is impossible in principle, a very strong claim that requires more substantial justification.
Rating Explanation
The paper presents a philosophical critique of AGI, but lacks scientific rigor and misrepresents opposing views. The author makes overly strong claims without sufficient evidence and dismisses the relevance of practical advancements in AI. The core arguments rely on anecdotal examples and philosophical assumptions, rather than a systematic and data-driven analysis of AI research and its potential.
Good to know
This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Original Title:
Why general artificial intelligence will not be realized
File Name:
s41599-020-0494-4.pdf
[download]
File Size:
0.38 MB
Uploaded:
July 14, 2025 at 10:36 AM
Privacy:
🌐 Public
© 2025 Paperzilla. All rights reserved.