Model Evaluation: An Adequacy-for-Purpose View
Overview
Paper Summary
The paper argues for an "adequacy-for-purpose" view of model evaluation, where a model's quality is assessed based on its suitability for specific purposes rather than solely on its representational accuracy. It introduces two notions of adequacy (success in a particular use and reliability in a type of use) and highlights how user, methodology, and circumstances influence a model's adequacy.
Explain Like I'm Five
Scientists found that a "good" plan or drawing isn't just about how perfect it looks. It's good if it works well for what you need it to do, like building a strong tower or finding a hidden treasure!
Possible Conflicts of Interest
The author acknowledges funding from the European Research Council, but no specific conflicts of interest related to the research topic are apparent.
Identified Limitations
Rating Explanation
This paper presents a valuable perspective on model evaluation, emphasizing the importance of considering a model's fitness for its intended purpose rather than solely focusing on representational accuracy. It offers a well-reasoned argument and introduces helpful conceptual distinctions, such as between different types of adequacy. While it lacks practical implementation details and a mid-level theory, its conceptual contributions warrant a strong rating. No evidence of anti-cheating measures was found.
Good to know
This is the Starter analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →