PAPERZILLA
Crunching Academic Papers into Bite-sized Insights.
About
Sign Out
← Back to papers
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications
Learning design to support student-Al collaboration: perspectives of leading teachers for Al in education
★
★
★
★
☆
SHARE
Overview
Paper Summary
Conflicts of Interest
Identified Weaknesses
Rating Explanation
Good to know
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Paper Summary
Paperzilla title
Teachers Want AI Learning Buddies for Students (and They Need Training Too!)
Teachers envision AI not just as a tool but as a collaborative learning agent, emphasizing the development of students' cognitive, social, and digital capacities through interdisciplinary learning and authentic problem-solving. They also highlight the need for teacher training, robust infrastructure, a collaborative school culture, and careful consideration of ethical implications related to student-AI interaction.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
None identified
Identified Weaknesses
Limited generalizability
The study acknowledges its limitations in terms of generalizability due to the small sample size and the focus on leading teachers. This makes it difficult to extrapolate the findings to a broader population of teachers and diverse school settings.
Lack of model validation
While the SAC model provides a conceptual framework, it lacks practical application and testing in diverse classroom settings. Further research is needed to validate and refine the model through real-world implementation and evaluation.
Lack of empirical evidence on student outcomes
The study focuses on teacher perceptions and anticipated student development but does not offer empirical data on actual student outcomes or the effectiveness of SAC in practice.
Rating Explanation
This paper provides valuable insights into teachers' perspectives on integrating AI into K-12 education, focusing on student-AI collaboration. The proposed SAC model offers a holistic framework for design and implementation. However, the limited generalizability and lack of empirical data on student outcomes warrant a rating of 4 instead of 5.
Good to know
This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Original Title:
Learning design to support student-Al collaboration: perspectives of leading teachers for Al in education
File Name:
s10639-021-10831-6.pdf
[download]
File Size:
0.99 MB
Uploaded:
July 14, 2025 at 11:14 AM
Privacy:
🌐 Public
© 2025 Paperzilla. All rights reserved.