PAPERZILLA
Crunching Academic Papers into Bite-sized Insights.
About
Sign Out
← Back to papers

Life SciencesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyGenetics

Can functional foods reduce the risk of disease? Advancement of functional food definition and steps to create functional food products
SHARE
Overview
Paper Summary
Conflicts of Interest
Identified Weaknesses
Rating Explanation
Good to know
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Paper Summary
Paperzilla title
Functional Foods: More Hype Than Substance?
The paper proposes an updated definition of functional foods emphasizing their role in promoting optimal health, reducing disease risk, and managing symptoms. It outlines a 14-step process for developing functional food products and advocates for the recognition of 'functional food science' as a distinct field.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
The authors' close affiliation with the Functional Food Center (FFC) raises concerns about potential bias, as the FFC has a vested interest in promoting its own definition of functional foods and advocating for the recognition of this category by regulatory bodies.
Identified Weaknesses
Over-reliance on FFC definition
The paper's heavy reliance on the Functional Food Center's (FFC) definition of functional foods creates a significant weakness, as this definition lacks widespread recognition and acceptance within the scientific community and regulatory bodies like the FDA. This reliance undermines the objectivity and generalizability of the paper's claims.
Overly complex product development process
The paper presents a 14-step process for developing functional food products, which seems excessively complex and potentially impractical for real-world application. The feasibility and scalability of this process are questionable.
Lack of critical evaluation of existing evidence
While the paper acknowledges the importance of rigorous scientific research, it lacks a critical evaluation of existing studies and evidence supporting the health benefits of specific functional foods. This weakens the scientific basis of the paper's arguments.
Inadequate discussion of limitations
The paper's discussion of the limitations of after-market research and epidemiological studies is superficial and lacks concrete solutions for addressing these challenges. This limits the practical relevance of the paper's recommendations.
Rating Explanation
The paper's over-reliance on the FFC's unvalidated definition, overly complex product development process, and lack of critical evaluation of existing evidence severely limit its scientific rigor. The authors' close affiliation with the FFC further raises concerns about potential bias.
Good to know
This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →
File Information
Original Title:
Can functional foods reduce the risk of disease? Advancement of functional food definition and steps to create functional food products
File Name:
1416.pdf
[download]
File Size:
0.57 MB
Uploaded:
July 14, 2025 at 10:31 AM
Privacy:
🌐 Public
© 2025 Paperzilla. All rights reserved.

If you are not redirected automatically, click here.