The study simplifies complex physical processes by not explicitly modeling convective plumes, volcanic ash, or ash-water/ash-sulfur aggregation. Instead, it uses indirect parameters like cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and ice albedo. This simplification might affect the precision of the simulated ice distribution and thickness, as the full complexity of particle interactions and atmospheric dynamics is not captured.
Atmospheric Chemistry Assumptions
The model assumes an oxidizing atmosphere and a direct conversion of SO2 to H2SO4 without explicitly simulating the photochemical formation of H2SO4. This could influence the accuracy of the simulated climatic impacts of sulfuric acid and its role in preserving ice.
Uncertainty in Early Martian Conditions
The simulations rely on several assumed parameters for early Mars, such as atmospheric density, temperature profile, and plume height estimates for very high mass eruption rates, which are not well-constrained by observational data. The reliance on these uncertain conditions introduces an element of approximation into the results.
No Atmospheric Escape Model
The study acknowledges not modeling atmospheric escape processes, which could mean that the amount of water vapor injected to very high altitudes might partially escape to space. Consequently, the simulated surface ice distributions might represent an upper bound of potential ice contribution.
Potential Underestimation of Proximal Ice
The model might underestimate the amount of ice deposited very close to the volcanic vents, particularly if column collapse events lead to substantial ice accumulation in those areas.