Paper Summary
Paperzilla title
Patently Obvious? A New Way to Measure a Journal's Tech Impact (But It's Kinda Wonky)
The study proposes a new indicator, the Relative Technology Factor (TFR), to measure a journal's technological impact based on citations in patent applications. The TFR considers factors like the GDP of countries where patent protection is sought and the number of cited references in a patent family, but correlates weakly with existing scientific impact indicators.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
The work was financed by the Spanish government and the European Regional Development Fund. This does not automatically imply a conflict of interest, but it is worth noting as a potential source of bias.
Identified Weaknesses
The dataset used (Patstat) has limitations. It is oriented towards patent examination, not bibliometrics, leading to inconsistencies in Non-Patent Literature references. Also, data exchange agreements with patent offices can create gaps in the data.
Citation Window Limitation
The reliance on a 5-year citation window may not fully capture the long-term technological impact of research, as patent evaluation and publication can take a considerable time.
The TFR indicator has shown instability in recent years, possibly due to ongoing patent evaluation processes. This raises concerns about the reliability of the indicator for the most recent years.
Low Correlation with Established Metrics
The low correlation between TFR and established indicators like SJR and JIF raises questions about whether TFR truly captures a distinct aspect of research performance or simply reflects noise in the data.
Skewed Distribution of TFR Scores
The study acknowledges that TFR scores are highly skewed, with many journals having a TFR of zero. This limits the applicability of the indicator for comparative analysis across all journals.
Rating Explanation
This paper presents a novel approach to measuring technological impact, but several methodological limitations and the observed instability of the indicator warrant a moderate rating. The limitations of the dataset, the citation window, and the skewed distribution of scores, along with the low correlation with established metrics, prevent a higher rating. While the funding source is noted, it does not appear to represent a direct conflict of interest with the research topic.
Good to know
This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
File Information
Original Title:
A further step forward in measuring journals' technological factor
Uploaded:
July 14, 2025 at 05:24 PM
© 2025 Paperzilla. All rights reserved.