Correlation, Not Causation
The study only identifies statistical associations between transients, nuclear testing, and UAP reports. It does not provide evidence of a direct causal relationship, meaning one event isn't necessarily causing the other.
Small Magnitude of Associations
Despite being statistically significant due to a large dataset, the observed associations are described as 'small magnitude.' This implies that while not random, the connections are weak and many other factors likely contribute to the phenomena.
The paper acknowledges substantial noise in UAP sighting data (due to witness error) and potential misidentifications in transient data. These inaccuracies can weaken the reliability of the observed associations.
Mismatch in Geographic Scope
Transients were observed from a single observatory (Palomar) while nuclear tests and UAP reports occurred worldwide. This geographic disparity makes it challenging to interpret direct links, as local atmospheric conditions or plate defects at the observatory cannot be universally correlated with global events.
Heterogeneous Nature of Transients
The authors suggest that the transients themselves may arise from multiple different causes, which would naturally dilute any specific associations with a single correlative factor like nuclear tests or UAPs.