With only 16 participants completing the study, the findings are not robust enough to draw definitive conclusions. Larger studies are necessary to confirm the results.
The absence of a control group makes it difficult to determine if the observed improvements were solely due to the ketogenic diet or other factors like standard therapy or time.
This limits the ability to compare the ketogenic diet to other dietary interventions or standard care alone.
Potential for selection bias
Participants volunteered, meaning those interested in keto diets may be more likely to enroll, potentially skewing the results.
Risk of demand characteristics
Participants were aware of the study's goal, which could influence their self-reported outcomes.
Lack of detailed information on counseling
Variation in counseling types and frequency among participants could confound the results.
Potential practice effects on cognitive tests
Repeated cognitive testing can lead to improved scores simply due to familiarity, making it difficult to isolate the diet's true impact on cognition.