Paper Summary
Paperzilla title
A New Way to Pick the Best Builder (No More Low-Ballers!)
This research presents a method for selecting the best contractor for major construction projects, involving a large group of experts. It considers expert expertise levels, uses a new way to gather opinions, and applies a decision-making technique that handles uncertainty and avoids common pitfalls of simpler methods.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
None identified
Identified Weaknesses
Lack of Data Transparency
The paper lacks sufficient detail on the data used for the case study, making reproducibility challenging.
The proposed method is computationally intensive, potentially limiting its practical applicability to large-scale problems.
Feedback Mechanism Dependence
The feedback mechanism's effectiveness relies on expert willingness to revise opinions, which might not always be realistic.
The reliance on GCLEs adds complexity for experts and introduces potential subjectivity in interpretations.
Rating Explanation
The paper proposes a novel and comprehensive approach to bid evaluation in large-scale group decision-making contexts, addressing important issues like expert expertise levels and consensus. The use of PHFLTSs for information fusion and ELECTRE III for ranking is innovative. While the complexity of the approach and the reliance on expert feedback are limitations, the overall contribution is strong.
Good to know
This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
File Information
Original Title:
Bid Evaluation for Major Construction Projects Under Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Environment and Characterized Expertise Levels
Uploaded:
July 14, 2025 at 10:40 AM
© 2025 Paperzilla. All rights reserved.