Paper Summary
Paperzilla title
GPT-4: Aceing Exams, But Still Hallucinating Occasionally
GPT-4 demonstrates human-level performance on many academic and professional exams, outperforming existing large language models on various NLP tasks. Despite its capabilities, GPT-4 still exhibits limitations like "hallucinations" and biases, necessitating further research and development in safety and alignment.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
The authors are affiliated with OpenAI, the organization responsible for developing GPT-4, which could potentially introduce bias in the evaluation and reporting of results.
Identified Weaknesses
Extrapolated Percentile Ranges for Some Exams
The evaluation methodology for certain exams, such as the AMC 10 and 12, relies on extrapolation due to unpublished 2022 score distributions, leading to uncertainty in the reported percentile ranges.
Limited Transparency in Model Details
The report lacks transparency regarding important details like model size, training data, and specific training methods, hindering reproducibility and further analysis by the broader research community.
Brittleness of Current Safety Mitigations
While the report addresses some safety risks, it acknowledges the limitations and potential brittleness of current mitigations, highlighting the need for further research and development in safety and alignment.
Limited Multilingual Evaluation
The report primarily focuses on English-language benchmarks, with limited evaluation of performance in other languages, potentially overlooking cultural biases and language-specific limitations.
Potential Biases in Expert Adversarial Testing
Despite using domain experts for adversarial testing, the report acknowledges potential biases in expert selection and interpretation of risks, potentially overlooking certain vulnerabilities or failure modes.
Rating Explanation
This report presents a significant contribution to the field of large language models, demonstrating impressive capabilities on various benchmarks while also acknowledging limitations and potential risks. The evaluation methodology is generally robust, though some limitations exist, such as the use of extrapolated percentiles and the lack of full transparency in certain model details. The report also raises crucial questions about safety, ethics, and societal impact, making it a valuable resource for future research and development.
Good to know
This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
File Information
Original Title:
GPT-4 Technical Report
Uploaded:
July 16, 2025 at 11:33 AM
© 2025 Paperzilla. All rights reserved.