A Moral Agency Framework for Legitimate Integration of AI in Bureaucracies

★

☆

SHARE

Overview

Paper Summary

Conflicts of Interest

Identified Weaknesses

Rating Explanation

Good to know

Topic Hierarchy

File Information

Paper Summary

Paperzilla title

AI in Government: Tool, Not Tyrant - Keeping Humans Accountable

This paper proposes a framework for integrating AI into government bureaucracies while maintaining human accountability and transparency. It argues against attributing moral agency to AI systems and instead suggests that AI should enhance human agency and be treated as an extension of existing bureaucratic infrastructure. The proposed Moral Agency Framework emphasizes clear human accountability, verifiable system outputs, and responsible deployment of AI that supports both legislative legitimacy and institutional stewardship.

Possible Conflicts of Interest

None identified

Identified Weaknesses

Lack of empirical evidence

The framework is largely theoretical and lacks concrete examples or case studies of its application in real-world bureaucratic settings.

Limited scope of application

The focus is heavily on Weberian bureaucracy, which may not fully capture the complexities of modern public administrations.

Limited generalizability

The paper assumes a democratic context, and the framework's applicability to non-democratic governments is unclear.

Rating Explanation

This paper offers a well-reasoned framework for integrating AI into bureaucracies while maintaining ethical standards. It addresses important concerns about transparency and accountability, proposing concrete steps for ensuring responsible AI implementation. While primarily theoretical, the arguments are sound and provide a valuable starting point for practical guidelines.

Good to know

This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.

Explore Pro →