Limited Data Availability and Potential Bias
The study acknowledges that the data presented is not readily available due to confidentiality obligations, which limits the ability to verify and build upon the findings independently. The reliance on interviews and media reports, while valuable for understanding political narratives, presents a risk of bias and lacks the rigor of quantitative data analysis. Furthermore, the ongoing nature of the COVID-19 pandemic makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about long-term policy changes and their impacts, as acknowledged by the authors themselves.
Limited Regional Contextualization
While the study focuses on Chile and Peru, it briefly mentions similar exclusionary trends across the region. However, it would benefit from expanding on these regional comparisons to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the issue and to support the claim that Chile and Peru reflect a broader pattern.
Narrow Definition of Integration
The paper primarily adopts a narrow definition of integration focused on formal labor market access and social service utilization. While acknowledged, a deeper exploration of broader inclusion aspects like social and cultural belonging would provide a more nuanced understanding of the migrant experience.
Lack of Concrete Future Research Plan
The study mentions future research directions but lacks a concrete plan for addressing the limitations identified, especially regarding data access and regional comparison. This weakens the potential impact and future development of the research.