Lack of Practical Validation
The paper lacks practical examples and case studies demonstrating the real-world application and benefits of the proposed CDT framework in construction projects. This limits the ability to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of the approach.
Limited Lifecycle Perspective
The paper primarily focuses on the construction phase and does not adequately address the integration of CDT throughout the entire building lifecycle, including design, operation, and demolition. A comprehensive approach considering all lifecycle phases is crucial for realizing the full potential of DTs in the built environment.
Lack of Implementation Details
The paper does not offer a detailed technical implementation plan or discuss the specific technologies and tools required for developing and deploying CDTs. Practical considerations, such as data storage, processing, and security, are not fully explored.
While the paper mentions several AI techniques for prediction and optimization, it lacks a detailed explanation of how these techniques would be applied in the context of construction. Specific algorithms, data requirements, and training processes are not discussed.
Lack of User Interface Considerations
The paper acknowledges the importance of user engagement but doesn't delve into the specific user interface and interaction design considerations for CDTs in construction. User experience is crucial for the successful adoption and utilization of any technology.