Limited statistical power in subgroup and interaction analyses
While the cohort studies themselves are quite large, splitting them by genetic subgroups to identify interactions significantly reduces the available sample sizes for these analyses, limiting their statistical power. It increases the possibility of false positive findings and reduces the confidence in accurately estimating effect sizes for these interactions.
Limited generalizability of findings due to homogeneous study population
The study population consists of predominantly white, well-educated individuals of European descent, primarily from the US. This demographic homogeneity limits the generalizability of the findings to other ethnic groups and populations with different socioeconomic backgrounds.
Potential inaccuracies in dietary assessment due to reliance on self-reported data
Dietary assessments were based on self-reported food frequency questionnaires. Although these questionnaires have been validated, they are still subject to recall bias and measurement error, especially when recalling long-term dietary habits. This could lead to inaccuracies in estimating the impact of the Mediterranean diet.
Potential misclassification of dementia diagnoses due to reliance on self-reports and death records
Dementia diagnoses were primarily based on self-reports and death certificates, potentially leading to misclassification of cases. While the authors claim validation based on professional background and consistency with genetic risk, it does not fully mitigate this limitation. Objective clinical assessments are ideal for stronger validation.
Limitations of Mendelian Randomization
Mendelian randomization was used to explore causal links between metabolites and cognitive outcomes. MR is a powerful technique but relies on strong assumptions, such as no horizontal pleiotropy. Violations of these assumptions can weaken causal inferences.
Lack of direct investigation of mechanisms
While the study identifies potential metabolic pathways involved in dementia risk, it does not directly assess the function or mechanisms of these pathways. Further research, possibly utilizing in vitro or in vivo models, is needed to determine if these pathways play a causal role in AD/ADRD.