Although multiple imputation was utilized along with sample and attrition weights to account for loss to follow up, it is unknown if those who dropped out of the study had significant differences from those who completed it. The missing at random assumption may not hold true.
Lack of granularity with sexual and gender minority status
The study was unable to disentangle gender identity of participants due to sample size restrictions. Participants who had intersectional identities (e.g., sexual minority and gender minority) may have different experiences and risks.
Overestimation of suicide attempts
Because the study relied on self-reported suicide attempts, there may be overestimation of attempts. The study authors admit that some attempts classified in the study may not have been with the intent to die.
Cross-sectional design limits causal inference
The study design is cross-sectional, preventing any determination of causality. Socioeconomic circumstances and/or awareness of sexual identity may have been different for participants when the suicide attempts occurred.
Unemployment data may not fully capture socioeconomic status
Parent unemployment status may not reflect the complete economic situation within the household, and the researchers did not collect data on any other source of income, potentially leading to underestimation of socioeconomic hardship.