Projectification mediates between experimental and bureaucratic institutional logics in urban sustainability planning
Descripción general
Resumen del artículo
This study of Swedish urban sustainability planners found they value both traditional and innovative approaches, but project management practices tend to reinforce traditional, bureaucratic approaches. While planners express a desire for flexibility and open-ended exploration, in practice, they prioritize clear objectives and roles, potentially limiting more radical sustainability ambitions.
Explícamelo como si tuviera cinco años
Swedish city planners like both traditional and innovative approaches to urban sustainability, but in practice, project-based work often favors traditional methods.
Posibles conflictos de intereses
The authors received funding from Viable cities and VINNOVA, but there's no information suggesting these organizations have direct, vested interests in specific outcomes that would bias the research.
Limitaciones identificadas
Explicación de la calificación
This is a reasonable study with a mixed-methods approach. However, the limited sample size, reliance on self-reported perceptions, and lack of direct behavioral observation prevent a higher rating. The funding sources do not appear to present a significant conflict of interest.
Conviene saber
Este es el análisis de Starter. Paperzilla Pro verifica cada cita, investiga los antecedentes de los autores y las fuentes de financiación, y utiliza razonamiento avanzado con IA para ofrecer información más exhaustiva.
Explorar Pro →