PAPERZILLA
Crunching Academic Papers into Bite-sized Insights.
About
Sign Out
← Back to papers
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence
Potemkin Understanding in Large Language Models
★
★
★
★
☆
SHARE
Overview
Paper Summary
Conflicts of Interest
Identified Weaknesses
Rating Explanation
Good to know
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Paper Summary
Paperzilla title
LLMs: Great at Definitions, Not So Great at Actually Using Them!
The paper introduces the concept of "potemkin understanding" in LLMs, where models can correctly define concepts but fail to apply them accurately. This highlights a critical flaw in current LLM evaluation methods that rely on benchmark datasets designed for humans.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
None identified
Identified Weaknesses
Limited Benchmark Dataset
The benchmark dataset, while extensive, is not exhaustive and could benefit from additional data encompassing a wider range of concepts and types of keystone questions for a more comprehensive identification of potemkins.
Simplified Keystone Sets
The reliance on single definition questions as keystones may not fully capture the nuances of understanding a concept, as keystones in reality could involve multiple questions demonstrating application.
Potentially Difficult 'Use' Tasks
The difficulty of the 'use' tasks in the benchmark is questioned, with a possibility that even humans might struggle with them, potentially confounding the potemkin analysis.
Lower Bound on Potemkin Rate
The automated procedure for evaluating potemkins only provides a lower bound and may not capture the full extent of the issue.
LLM Self-Grading Assumption
The approach assumes that LLMs can be used for self-grading, which may not always be reliable due to potential biases or limitations in model capabilities.
Rating Explanation
This paper introduces a novel and significant concept in LLM evaluation – "potemkin understanding." The proposed framework and empirical analyses are well-structured and provide compelling evidence for the prevalence of this phenomenon. While the methodology has some limitations (e.g., the lower-bound nature of the automated potemkin detection), the work opens important avenues for future research.
Good to know
This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Original Title:
Potemkin Understanding in Large Language Models
File Name:
2506.21521v2.pdf
[download]
File Size:
2.90 MB
Uploaded:
July 08, 2025 at 12:10 PM
Privacy:
🌐 Public
© 2025 Paperzilla. All rights reserved.