Potemkin Understanding in Large Language Models

★

☆

SHARE

Overview

Paper Summary

Conflicts of Interest

Identified Weaknesses

Rating Explanation

Good to know

Topic Hierarchy

File Information

Paper Summary

Paperzilla title

LLMs: Great at Definitions, Not So Great at Actually Using Them!

The paper introduces the concept of "potemkin understanding" in LLMs, where models can correctly define concepts but fail to apply them accurately. This highlights a critical flaw in current LLM evaluation methods that rely on benchmark datasets designed for humans.

Possible Conflicts of Interest

None identified

Identified Weaknesses

Limited Benchmark Dataset

The benchmark dataset, while extensive, is not exhaustive and could benefit from additional data encompassing a wider range of concepts and types of keystone questions for a more comprehensive identification of potemkins.

Simplified Keystone Sets

The reliance on single definition questions as keystones may not fully capture the nuances of understanding a concept, as keystones in reality could involve multiple questions demonstrating application.

Potentially Difficult 'Use' Tasks

The difficulty of the 'use' tasks in the benchmark is questioned, with a possibility that even humans might struggle with them, potentially confounding the potemkin analysis.

Lower Bound on Potemkin Rate

The automated procedure for evaluating potemkins only provides a lower bound and may not capture the full extent of the issue.

LLM Self-Grading Assumption

The approach assumes that LLMs can be used for self-grading, which may not always be reliable due to potential biases or limitations in model capabilities.

Rating Explanation

This paper introduces a novel and significant concept in LLM evaluation – "potemkin understanding." The proposed framework and empirical analyses are well-structured and provide compelling evidence for the prevalence of this phenomenon. While the methodology has some limitations (e.g., the lower-bound nature of the automated potemkin detection), the work opens important avenues for future research.

Good to know

This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.

Explore Pro →