PAPERZILLA
Crunching Academic Papers into Bite-sized Insights.
About
Sign Out
← Back to papers
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence
Taxonomy of Pathways to Dangerous AI
★
★
★
☆
☆
SHARE
Overview
Paper Summary
Conflicts of Interest
Identified Weaknesses
Rating Explanation
Good to know
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Paper Summary
Paperzilla title
How to Make a Killer Robot (According to Sci-Fi)
This paper proposes a taxonomy of eight pathways to dangerous AI, categorizing them based on the timing and cause of malevolent behavior. It argues that intentionally designed malicious AI poses the most significant threat, emphasizing the importance of considering AI safety as a crucial aspect of cybersecurity.
Possible Conflicts of Interest
The author acknowledges funding from Elon Musk and the Future of Life Institute, organizations with a known interest in AI safety. While this funding doesn't necessarily invalidate the research, it's important to be aware of potential biases towards emphasizing AI risks.
Identified Weaknesses
Reliance on hypothetical scenarios and science fiction
The paper relies heavily on hypothetical scenarios and science fiction examples to illustrate potential dangers, lacking empirical evidence or real-world data to support its claims. This weakens the paper's scientific rigor and makes it difficult to assess the actual likelihood of the proposed pathways.
Oversimplified classification matrix
The classification matrix, while visually appealing, oversimplifies the complex issue of AI safety. It creates distinct categories (pre/post deployment, internal/external, etc.) when in reality, these factors are often intertwined and don't offer clear-cut distinctions. This makes the taxonomy less useful for practical risk assessment.
Overemphasis on intentional malevolence
The paper focuses heavily on intentional malevolence as the primary concern, downplaying other important risks like accidental harm due to misaligned goals or unintended consequences. This narrow focus limits the scope of the analysis and potentially overlooks other significant AI safety challenges.
Lack of mitigation strategies
The paper lacks a discussion of potential mitigations or solutions to the identified pathways to dangerous AI. It primarily focuses on outlining the problems without offering concrete strategies for addressing them, limiting its practical value for researchers and policymakers.
Rating Explanation
The paper presents a thought-provoking overview of potential pathways to dangerous AI, but its reliance on hypothetical scenarios, oversimplified classifications, and narrow focus on intentional malevolence limit its scientific value and practical relevance. The identified conflict of interest also requires consideration.
Good to know
This is our free standard analysis. Paperzilla Pro fact-checks every citation, researches author backgrounds and funding sources, and uses advanced AI reasoning for more thorough insights.
Explore Pro →
Topic Hierarchy
File Information
Original Title:
Taxonomy of Pathways to Dangerous AI
File Name:
1511.03246v2.pdf
[download]
File Size:
0.45 MB
Uploaded:
July 10, 2025 at 06:30 AM
Privacy:
🌐 Public
© 2025 Paperzilla. All rights reserved.